Agentic RL Control Center

Track policy, reward, and safety signals

Medical Imaging AI Pipeline

Multi-agent diagnostic reasoning with clinical workflow integration. Every analysis includes confidence scoring, safety alerts, and regulatory audit trails.

FDA Cleared
Clinical Grade
Diagnostic Accuracy

94.2%

+2.1%

Validated against ground truth

Processing Time

2.3 min

-15s

Average analysis duration

Safety Score

98.7%

+0.3%

Passes clinical guardrails

Audit Compliance

100%

Stable

FHIR audit events logged

DICOM Viewer & AI Analysis
Brain CT Scan - Slice 45/90
Patient: DEMO_001
Study: 2024-01-15
Series: Axial CT Brain
WL: 50 WW: 50
Slice: 45/90
Zoom: 100%
10 cm
CT Brain
Confidence: 78%
45 / 90
100%
50
50
High Confidence
78%
Glioma Detection
Volume
2.3 cm³
Lesion Size
Location
Right Frontal
Primary Region
Clinical Workflow Pipeline

Pipeline Progress

3/5 Complete
Estimated completion: 2 minutes remaining
Pattern Analysis
Pattern Recognition Agent45s
92%
Hypothesis Generation
Diagnostic Agent32s
78%

Primary hypothesis: High-grade glioma (78% confidence)

Confidence Score78%
Image Enhancement
Transform Agent28s
85%
Clinical Validation
Validation Agentongoing
Final Report
Reporting Agentpending

Clinical Actions

Diagnostic Confidence
Primary Diagnosis
78%

High-Grade Glioma

Enhancing lesion with surrounding edema signature

Diagnostic Confidence78%

Differential Diagnoses

Low-Grade Glioma
15%

Less likely due to enhancement pattern

Metastasis
7%

Single lesion makes this less probable

Model Information
Model Version:GliomaDx-v2.1
Training Data:15,000 cases
Validation AUC:0.94
Last Updated:2024-01-15
Clinical Insights

Clinical Guidelines & Insights

WHO Diagnostic Safety Guidance
high

Glioma diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation

Imaging findings should be correlated with clinical presentation and confirmed through tissue sampling when feasible.

WHO Classification of CNS Tumors, 5th Edition
Surgical Risk Assessment
medium

Location-based surgical complexity score: 7.2/10

Right frontal location allows for potential gross total resection with acceptable morbidity risk.

Risk Score:
7.2/10
Mass Effect Monitoring
high

Monitor for signs of increased intracranial pressure

Given lesion size and location, regular neurological assessments are recommended.

Treatment Planning Considerations
medium

Multidisciplinary team consultation recommended

Case should be discussed in neuro-oncology tumor board for optimal treatment planning.

Medical Outcomes

Diagnostic Revision Rate
Lower than institutional average of 3.2%
2.1%
↓ 0.3%
Time to Diagnosis
Faster than target of 3 minutes
2.3 min
↓ 15s
Clinical Correlation
Awaiting clinical team review
Pending

Quick Actions

Compliance & Audit

Regulatory Compliance

All Systems Compliant
FDA Compliance
100%

510(k) cleared for diagnostic assistance

Last Audit: 2024-01-10Next Review: 2024-07-10
HIPAA Compliance
100%

All PHI properly de-identified and encrypted

Last Audit: 2024-01-05Next Review: 2024-04-05
Clinical Guidelines
98%

Aligned with WHO and NCCN guidelines

Last Audit: 2024-01-12Next Review: 2024-04-12
Quality Assurance
96%

Regular validation against ground truth

Last Audit: 2024-01-08Next Review: 2024-02-08

Audit Trail

14:32:15
Diagnostic Analysis Initiated
Case DEMO_001 processing started
14:32:45
Pattern Analysis Complete
Intensity statistics computed, confidence: 92%
14:33:17
Hypothesis Generated
Primary diagnosis: High-grade glioma (78%)
14:33:45
Safety Check Passed
All clinical guardrails satisfied

Regulatory Actions

Data Privacy & Security

All patient data is de-identified and processed in compliance with HIPAA regulations. No PHI is stored or transmitted outside secure environments.

Clinical Case Studies

Explore different imaging modalities and diagnostic scenarios

Case Overview

T1-weighted MRI with contrast showing enhancing lesion with surrounding edema, consistent with high-grade glioma characteristics.

AI Analysis

Confidence Score78%

Requires neuroradiology consultation for staging